3 ms·
This is a fun post, but I can't bring myself to believe... > Not one teacher could differentiate type written papers, from dot matrix. It just strains creduli
by michaelcampbell 5y ago
This is a fun post, but I can't bring myself to believe...
> Not one teacher could differentiate type written papers, from dot matrix.
It just strains credulity. Daisy wheel, sure, but not in the history of dot matrix printers, from start to finish, were they comparable to typewritten output.
- HeyLaughingBoy 5y agoThe 24-pin ones used to advertise themselves as being almost indistinguishable from a typewriter. If you didn't look too closely, they actually were.
- qsi 5y agoYou could get close to inkjets and early laser printers with Signum! on the ST and 24-pin dot matrix printer. It used custom bitmapped fonts and very fine control of the pins to generate amazing output. It was very slow in the highest quality setting, but most people couldn't tell it apart from much more expensive solutions. It also had an astounding equation editor which made it great for STEM work.
- michaelcampbell 5y ago"too closely" hardly qualifies IMO as "indistinguishable". Maybe I'm a printer nerd, but I could generally tell the printer manufacturer from its output in the time they were popular. Not to mention that back then, I don't think any consumer-grade dot matrix used single sheet paper like a typewriter would. The tractor punched-hole bars on the side after removal would give it away; even that fancy super-perforated stuff.