4 ms·
Here's one done with jpegoptim -m 40, which gets it down to 28k: Original 123k picture on top, 28k picture on bottom: https://imgur.com/a/hZy46K3 https://imgu
by tyingq 5y ago
Here's one done with jpegoptim -m 40, which gets it down to 28k:
Original 123k picture on top, 28k picture on bottom:
https://imgur.com/a/hZy46K3 https://imgur.com/a/hZy46K3
- ThePadawan 5y agoYes, this looks pretty much like my version. Maybe I'm just nit-picky, but I do quite clearly see greenish squares, especially on the forehead and nose area. Probably not enough to catch my eye, but strong enough that looking at the picture for 5 seconds I would say "boy this was compressed way too much".
- beervirus 5y agoYes it is less than perfect. It looks a lot better than the dithered examples though.
- kristopolous 5y agoYou've gotten rid of 78% of the bytes. That's an extremely little price to pay in quality for that kind of gain