4 ms·
My preferred policy would be to only remove speech which is actively calling for violence. This fits in line with a common conception of what we view as reason
by SamPatt 5y ago
My preferred policy would be to only remove speech which is actively calling for violence.
This fits in line with a common conception of what we view as reasonable limits on free speech.
Removing speech of people sharing their beliefs about the risks and rewards of putting substances in their bodies or other medical decisions doesn't meet this standard.
- goatlover 5y ago> Removing speech of people sharing their beliefs about the risks and rewards of putting substances in their bodies or other medical decisions doesn't meet this standard. That's different from spreading conspiracy theories about putting substance in their bodies. Actual disinformation (blatantly false) and not just discussing their hesitancy to get a vaccine.