3 ms·
So since we can't prevent all harm we shouldn't try to prevent any? That doesn't seem like a very compelling argument to me
by seoaeu 5y ago
So since we can't prevent all harm we shouldn't try to prevent any? That doesn't seem like a very compelling argument to me
- realreality 5y agoI prefer if we prevent harm by addressing the underlying conditions, rather than trying to control the spread of ideas. As long as we’re in a mindset of having to destroy all contagions (whether they’re proteins or thoughts), we’re going to create more problems.