That is a bogus argument. 1) Killing people is already a criminal act; 2) There are some people killing/beating people up with the slightest impetus. They will

That is a bogus argument. 1) Killing people is already a criminal act; 2) There are some people killing/beating people up with the slightest impetus. They will find that impetus whether Twitter allows people to discuss anything negative about the CCP; 3) Do you really want the speech of everyone to be regulated on the basis of the excuses used by psycho-killers? Do you think Jodie Foster should have been banned from appearing in movies? Update: And, just in time, this shows up[1,2]: > Tech firm LinkedIn has censored the profile of US journalist Bethany Allen-Ebrahimian[3] in China, inviting her to “update” content without specifying what triggered the block. Ah! She wrote a book about China[4]. Can't allow that! What if some random person becomes too critical of the CCP and assaults a random Asian-American in San Fransisco?[5] Let the attribution games begin! [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28694431 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28694431 [2]: https://hongkongfp.com/2021/09/29/microsofts-linkedin-censors-us-journalist-over-china-content-makes-disturbing-offer-for-reinstatement/ https://hongkongfp.com/2021/09/29/microsofts-linkedin-censor... [3]: https://www.axios.com/authors/baebrahimian/ https://www.axios.com/authors/baebrahimian/ [4]: https://twitter.com/BethanyAllenEbr/status/1443213045606588421 https://twitter.com/BethanyAllenEbr/status/14432130456065884... [5]: https://abc7news.com/pacific-heights-woman-bitten-asian-attacked-sf-dragged-runner/10938084/ https://abc7news.com/pacific-heights-woman-bitten-asian-atta...