>what evidence would convince you it is feasible? Short answer: a bill that passes. Again, I’m not arguing whether it’s technically feasible. I’m saying the

>what evidence would convince you it is feasible? Short answer: a bill that passes. Again, I’m not arguing whether it’s technically feasible. I’m saying the US has not yet shown its politically feasible. I think you’re conflating my position on these. That latter part is a much tougher and complex problem but every bit a necessary part of the solution. So take just a very small subset of that problem: how do you plan on mitigating the insurance industry’s influence in preventing the passage of a bill that goes against their interests? Once you figure that out, you’ll have dozens of other political concerns to solve before you ever get to consider implementing the technical solution.