IMO one of the reasons these debates go back and forth forever is because it’s impossible to come up hard and fast rules that cover every scenario. Maybe a poo

IMO one of the reasons these debates go back and forth forever is because it’s impossible to come up hard and fast rules that cover every scenario. Maybe a poorly thought out analogy but think about cars. There are a ton of car accidents every year, a good number of which result in death. But we don’t ban cars because they’re essential for the way many people live. But if 50% of all car journeys resulted in accidents? Maybe we’d be having a different conversation.