4 ms·
No I'm not claiming that, you're putting words in my mouth and you're misconstruing my arguments. I have been extremely clear. As I've had to painstakingly cla
by ehnto 5y ago
No I'm not claiming that, you're putting words in my mouth and you're misconstruing my arguments. I have been extremely clear.
As I've had to painstakingly clarify for you, just because I have commented on one thing, does not mean I am subtly making comments about other things. I am being very explicit, very clear. Please read my comments, because I'm not one to bury my lede.
A better way to approach this discussion may have been to ask me questions instead of just assuming answers. You could have asked, "Do you not believe they would have gone to war for other reasons?" to which I would have replied "Of course they likely would have! But it was over religion in this instance."
- rglullis 5y ago> it was over religion And as I've already put in another comment: it's not because religion was the justification for a conflict that we should attribute it to religion. Many disputes and fights were had over beautiful women. Should we start claiming that women are a problem?