3 ms·

Perhaps your perspective is based on your demographics or location? In my anecdotal experience I know vanishingly few people who are not on “original old Facebo

Perhaps your perspective is based on your demographics or location? In my anecdotal experience I know vanishingly few people who are not on “original old Facebook”. Male, 30s, southeast US.

StevePerkins 5y ago
There's a difference between "having an account" (I do too), versus "being any kind of active user". I am responding to a quote claiming that troll fake news "reached 140 million on Facebook". Clearly, this is speaking to the latter. You would have to be a fairly active user to run across deliberate misinformation, generated by offshore troll farms. That's not "I login once in a blue moon to spy on my ex", or "I have Messenger on my phone because a group that I'm in uses it to announce events". That is "I actively choose to consume angry and dumb political content on a regular basis". Perhaps I overestimate people, but 140 million seems high.
- pwinnski 5y ago
  > You would have to be a fairly active user to run across deliberate misinformation, generated by offshore troll farms. I think you are missing the point of this research. The entire point is that 19 of the top 20 Christian pages, for example, are produced by offshore troll farms, and until recently, this was generally not known. So no, you do not need to be a fairly active user, not at all. Many, many casual users came across this because it was incredibly widely shared, and because Facebook's algorithms push such content far and wide.
  - tylerrobinson 5y ago
    > Many, many casual users came across this because it was incredibly widely shared, and because Facebook's algorithms push such content far and wide. That's my take, too. I know exactly the sort of mass-produced garbage content they're talking about, since I see things that my friends interacted with in my Feed. Therefore I am part of the 140 million people who was exposed to the media produced by these operations.

Perhaps your perspective is based on your demographics or location? In my anecdotal experience I know vanishingly few people who are not on “original old Facebook”. Male, 30s, southeast US.

StevePerkins 5y ago

There's a difference between "having an account" (I do too), versus "being any kind of active user". I am responding to a quote claiming that troll fake news "reached 140 million on Facebook". Clearly, this is speaking to the latter. You would have to be a fairly active user to run across deliberate misinformation, generated by offshore troll farms. That's not "I login once in a blue moon to spy on my ex", or "I have Messenger on my phone because a group that I'm in uses it to announce events". That is "I actively choose to consume angry and dumb political content on a regular basis". Perhaps I overestimate people, but 140 million seems high.

pwinnski 5y ago
> You would have to be a fairly active user to run across deliberate misinformation, generated by offshore troll farms. I think you are missing the point of this research. The entire point is that 19 of the top 20 Christian pages, for example, are produced by offshore troll farms, and until recently, this was generally not known. So no, you do not need to be a fairly active user, not at all. Many, many casual users came across this because it was incredibly widely shared, and because Facebook's algorithms push such content far and wide.
- tylerrobinson 5y ago
  > Many, many casual users came across this because it was incredibly widely shared, and because Facebook's algorithms push such content far and wide. That's my take, too. I know exactly the sort of mass-produced garbage content they're talking about, since I see things that my friends interacted with in my Feed. Therefore I am part of the 140 million people who was exposed to the media produced by these operations.