4 ms·
Stalin had "socialism in one country," and yes, that has significant material and historical meaning, as opposed to being generic fluff. Because it was general
by droptablemain 5y ago
Stalin had "socialism in one country," and yes, that has significant material and historical meaning, as opposed to being generic fluff.
Because it was generally believed that building socialism required a number of successful workers' revolutions around the world. But basically every revolution at the time failed, other than the Bolshevik revolution. So they found themselves in an awkward position. Hence the strategy and policy of Stalin to build "socialism in one country."
This is one of the major breaks between Stalin and Trotsky.
- tcmart14 5y agoYup. Trotsky was a perpetual world-wide revolutionary. Revolution was a constant state in Trotsky's mind. Stalin just wasn't. Stalin was much more nationalist in his thinking.