5 ms·

Also nearly 100 million members of the Communist Party -- roughly 1/3 the size of the entire U.S.

thaumasiotes 5y ago
You don't generally join the party because you believe so strongly in communism. You join it for the improved job prospects.
- dragonelite 5y ago
  So people in the west do the same, improving your social network nothing wrong with it.
  - erulabs 5y ago
    Nothing wrong with joining a political party, empowering the single-party state, for better job prospects? Nothing wrong with acting contrary to your believes in order to get ahead of someone honest? Nothing wrong with it? What is right with it!?
    - orthecreedence 5y ago
      There's a single party in the US, and people here seem fine with it. In fact, because that party has two factions, we call it "freedom."
    - xnyan 5y ago
      A single party state is not an inherently evil thing. I think you can make a pretty strong argument that history has shown more negatives vs positives of single party states, but that’s not the same thing. Acting contrary to your beliefs, not theirs necessarily, and since when is people joining a group for the purposes of mutual benefit (and yes, competition against outgroup members) dishonest? There’s absolutely nothing inherently wrong with any of these behaviors, and I’m sure that there are many instances of behaviors you support in other circumstances.
      - dragonwriter 5y ago
        > A single party state is not an inherently evil thing. There’s different kinds of single party states: first, a transitory single party state that “single party” because the current political climate leaves only one party currently competitive but where other parties are not structurally prevented from competing, and thus factionalism within the dominant party will lead to the single party condition being short-lived (e.g., the U.S. during Democratic-Republican single-party rule in the 1810s-1820s.) This, while it can have problematic aspects, is not inherently evil or inconsistent with democratic governance. On the other extreme are systems where the dominant party has a structural (possibly in-law) monopoly or at least privileged status. As systems of public governnance, these are inherently evil.
    - Ekaros 5y ago
      I don't think changing that to two-party makes any difference, when the parties just switch which one is in power.
  - thaumasiotes 5y ago
    I'm not saying there's something wrong with it -- my point is strictly limited to the claim that the size of the Communist Party is not related to the strength of support for communism in China. (Though it's not all about improving your social network. You will still enjoy improved job prospects even if you have no relevant network.)
    - droptablemain 5y ago
      Ok, let's very conservatively estimate that 20% of them are deeply committed to China's ideological Marxism. That's 20 million people united. To downplay the importance of scale here is a bit misguided.
      - thaumasiotes 5y ago
        What makes that estimate "conservative"?
        droptablemain 5y ago
        You believe more than 80 percent of CPC members, who have studied Marxism throughout their lives, in primary school and university, are not ideological? I'd love to see the mental gymnastics you're doing to come up with that.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]

You don't generally join the party because you believe so strongly in communism. You join it for the improved job prospects.

dragonelite 5y ago
So people in the west do the same, improving your social network nothing wrong with it.
- erulabs 5y ago
  Nothing wrong with joining a political party, empowering the single-party state, for better job prospects? Nothing wrong with acting contrary to your believes in order to get ahead of someone honest? Nothing wrong with it? What is right with it!?
  - orthecreedence 5y ago
    There's a single party in the US, and people here seem fine with it. In fact, because that party has two factions, we call it "freedom."
  - xnyan 5y ago
    A single party state is not an inherently evil thing. I think you can make a pretty strong argument that history has shown more negatives vs positives of single party states, but that’s not the same thing. Acting contrary to your beliefs, not theirs necessarily, and since when is people joining a group for the purposes of mutual benefit (and yes, competition against outgroup members) dishonest? There’s absolutely nothing inherently wrong with any of these behaviors, and I’m sure that there are many instances of behaviors you support in other circumstances.
    - dragonwriter 5y ago
      > A single party state is not an inherently evil thing. There’s different kinds of single party states: first, a transitory single party state that “single party” because the current political climate leaves only one party currently competitive but where other parties are not structurally prevented from competing, and thus factionalism within the dominant party will lead to the single party condition being short-lived (e.g., the U.S. during Democratic-Republican single-party rule in the 1810s-1820s.) This, while it can have problematic aspects, is not inherently evil or inconsistent with democratic governance. On the other extreme are systems where the dominant party has a structural (possibly in-law) monopoly or at least privileged status. As systems of public governnance, these are inherently evil.
  - Ekaros 5y ago
    I don't think changing that to two-party makes any difference, when the parties just switch which one is in power.
- thaumasiotes 5y ago
  I'm not saying there's something wrong with it -- my point is strictly limited to the claim that the size of the Communist Party is not related to the strength of support for communism in China. (Though it's not all about improving your social network. You will still enjoy improved job prospects even if you have no relevant network.)
  - droptablemain 5y ago
    Ok, let's very conservatively estimate that 20% of them are deeply committed to China's ideological Marxism. That's 20 million people united. To downplay the importance of scale here is a bit misguided.
    - thaumasiotes 5y ago
      What makes that estimate "conservative"?
      - droptablemain 5y ago
        You believe more than 80 percent of CPC members, who have studied Marxism throughout their lives, in primary school and university, are not ideological? I'd love to see the mental gymnastics you're doing to come up with that.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]