4 ms·
The premise of the article is that it is unnecessary and inefficient to index the full text fields, as searching on fields is often more than enough. Other sol
by chromatin 5y ago
The premise of the article is that it is unnecessary and inefficient to index the full text fields, as searching on fields is often more than enough.
Other solutions like Loki, which only index non-full-text fields, are suggested.
Why not RDBMS? I have over 10 years come full circle from SQL/RDBMS -> NoSQL of various types -> SQL/RDBMS.
edit: Is it really that other databases types are better suited to high ingest rate / write-heavy light-read workloads?