This article is a bit strange. It's referring to the thread stack size but acting as though it's the main stack size. It's true there's no portable C API for do

This article is a bit strange. It's referring to the thread stack size but acting as though it's the main stack size. It's true there's no portable C API for doing anything with the main stack size, but musl libc doesn't behave any differently than glibc here -- the main stack is allocated by the kernel. The thread stack size on musl is small, yes, but the only way to even end up in a thread involves using the pthread API. The pthread API exposes an API for configuring the stack size for a thread; it's called pthread_attr_setstacksize. You can find it here: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/pthread_attr_setstacksize.html https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/p... Granted, it is maddening that C does not offer any great ways to reason about what stack size is needed, but it is simply nonsense to imply (as people seem to be inferring here) that there's no way for an application to handle running into musl's stack size limits.