> but assumes that you’re the only intelligent person who bothers to read critically That's reading a lot into what I wrote! There was a note of frustration, s

> but assumes that you’re the only intelligent person who bothers to read critically That's reading a lot into what I wrote! There was a note of frustration, sure, but upstream was just pointing out that I didn't find it credible. I disagree with you, but thanks for taking the time and the hits. Here, have an upvote.