3 ms·
$15 is too expensive, especially if you want to follow proper 3-2-1 it'll cost you $45/TB What happens to your Object Storage buckets when Cloudflare has an ou
by zacincceo 5y ago
$15 is too expensive, especially if you want to follow proper 3-2-1 it'll cost you $45/TB
What happens to your Object Storage buckets when Cloudflare has an outage? - https://filebase.com/blog/what-happens-when-my-cloud-goes-down/ https://filebase.com/blog/what-happens-when-my-cloud-goes-do...
- syshum 5y agoWhat do you mean... The cloud does not need backups /s
- nicoburns 5y agoIf you want to do proper 3-2-1, shouldn't you be storing the other backups on a different service?
- zacincceo 5y agoThat's the reason why most enterprises have 4-7 copies of their data..... No inherent geo-replication by default (and as CF shares, it's a "hotel California" problem.... Too expensive to egress completely from AWS.
- acdha 5y agoThe claim is that the service handles distribution across reliability, so I think the more interesting question is the odds of that _mechanism_ failing when your site would otherwise be up[1]. Similarly, 3-2-1 is a backup strategy and the pricing appears to already include multiple copies using the same mechanism so the correct calculation would be the cost of R2 plus whatever _different_ mechanism you choose for disaster recovery purposes such as on-premise storage or a completely different provider. 1. For example, if you use Cloudflare as your CDN / DNS provider and they have a catastrophic failure, the fact that your storage is inaccessible is just another facet of the same issue.