3 ms·
If Adobe changes the spec, they can, simply by being the market leader (bit like Chrome is) Not nice, but there you have it. It would be great if there was an
by prox 5y ago
If Adobe changes the spec, they can, simply by being the market leader (bit like Chrome is)
Not nice, but there you have it. It would be great if there was an Adobe SVG format in those cases perhaps.
- wombatmobile 5y agoAdobe is a W3C member and played a lead role in drafting the 1.0 spec, which was edited by Adobe’s Jon Ferrailo. If you are going to even hint that an Adobe product produces non-compliant SVG, please detail your claim so others can assess it. To not do so would be the first step towards a rumour, and might invite FUD that might devalue SVG’s status as an open standard supported enthusiastically in web and vector graphics ecosystems. We don’t want that, do we?
- baybal2 5y agoAnd Adobe was the one to sink the SVG 1.2... because of Inkscape
- wombatmobile 5y agoI'm not familiar with what you are referring to. Could you point me towards more information or discussion?