3 ms·
"The Chinese government's job is to ensure a level playing field for everybody" This is very upside down. The Chinese government actively opposes a 'level pla
by jollybean 5y ago
"The Chinese government's job is to ensure a level playing field for everybody"
This is very upside down.
The Chinese government actively opposes a 'level playing field and strongly prefers local companies, especially those with deep ties to the state.
Even export policy is natinalized. Huawei can offer it's customers internationally amazing financing terms (pay nothing down, and pay small amounts over time) provided by Chinese banks at the behest of the Chinese Government, facilitate by a politicized Central bank.
It would be like Biden/Trump ordering JP Morgan to finance Boeing deals, and to coordinate it all with the Treasury and the Central Bank.
That's a violation of basic trade norms - and that's just the export stuff.
Internally, there's much more control.
"One of the greatest reasons Western companies have failed in markets such as China (and India) is because they enter it with an air of arrogance."
This is not factual and you've provided no real evidence of that.
When US companies have 'hard protections', particularly in Brand, they do very well. Nike, Apple, Pizza Hut etc. all do very well.
But trains? China requires that train makers hand over their IP, the IP is given to local companies who then get a head start while the Chinese government holds the foreign company up in red tape.
The Chinese government 'role' is to absolutely minimize the amount of success foreign companies have to the extent they can duplicate/copy/reproduce locally, that's what they do.
Even foreign initiatives cannot actually be foreign owned: 51% has to be owned by Chinese.
The CCP puts a cadre of it's party staff within every company to ensure national guidelines are followed.
Your 'Dominos in India' example is countered by 'Yum Brands' i.e. KFC, Pizza Hut who were very successful in China.
- throwaway210222 5y ago> It would be like Biden/Trump ordering JP Morgan to finance Boeing deals, and to coordinate it all with the Treasury and the Central Bank. No need for that - the US government already finances Beoing's deals. There is a reason the US-government owned Export-Import Bank is known world-wide as "Boeing's Bank". https://www.mercatus.org/publications/government-spending/ex-im-still-boeings-bank https://www.mercatus.org/publications/government-spending/ex...
- mark_l_watson 5y agore: the post you responded to: I think that they meant that the Chinese government wants a level playing field and good competition between local Chinese companies. No country would ever want a level playing field that includes foreign companies. Grandfather poster: is my interpretation correct?
- jollybean 5y ago'Free Trade' is the attempt, more or less, to provide 'level playing field' for companies, even of other nations. It's why the WTO exists, it's why USMC exists etc.. Most of China's actions described above are fairly perfectly against the spirit of those deals, and probably the letter of the deals as well, and they should have never been allowed in. Capitol controls, direct control of the banking sector, arbitrary regulations that affect valuations fundamentally such as refusing to allow listing on US exchanges 'out of the blue', similarly. It's not really an open economy, and Western economies shouldn't be entirely open to it either. The best 'trade policy' we could put in effect would be to put in place all the same barriers that they have.