2 ms·
By "pushing the boundaries" do you mean "violating SVG standards" or is it the other editors who aren't keeping up with SVG2.0 etc?
by dccoolgai 5y ago
By "pushing the boundaries" do you mean "violating SVG standards" or is it the other editors who aren't keeping up with SVG2.0 etc?
- prox 5y agoIf Adobe changes the spec, they can, simply by being the market leader (bit like Chrome is) Not nice, but there you have it. It would be great if there was an Adobe SVG format in those cases perhaps.
- wombatmobile 5y agoAdobe is a W3C member and played a lead role in drafting the 1.0 spec, which was edited by Adobe’s Jon Ferrailo. If you are going to even hint that an Adobe product produces non-compliant SVG, please detail your claim so others can assess it. To not do so would be the first step towards a rumour, and might invite FUD that might devalue SVG’s status as an open standard supported enthusiastically in web and vector graphics ecosystems. We don’t want that, do we?
- baybal2 5y agoAnd Adobe was the one to sink the SVG 1.2... because of Inkscape
- wombatmobile 5y agoI'm not familiar with what you are referring to. Could you point me towards more information or discussion?
- duped 5y agoThe last I heard there wasn't a single rendering engine that passes the entire W3C test suite, let alone any two renderers that have the same coverage. I'm not sure if that is still the case. In my experience using SVG for portability is a minefield.
- jatone 5y agoyup. resvg is the best atm i think.