5 ms·
I like this method better: https://prideout.net/blog/octasphere/ https://prideout.net/blog/octasphere/ To me it produces more pleasant resulting mesh, which ge
by jmiskovic 5y ago
I like this method better: https://prideout.net/blog/octasphere/ https://prideout.net/blog/octasphere/
To me it produces more pleasant resulting mesh, which gets important with fewer subdivisions. Here's what it looks like: https://i.imgur.com/o3RFfZx.mp4 https://i.imgur.com/o3RFfZx.mp4
But the criticisms from slavik81 still applies, it produces long triangles with insufficient surface information for the flat parts.
- iainmerrick 5y agoIsn’t that exactly the same method? (Still a useful link, though, as it’s a great writeup from a slightly different perspective) Edit to add: doh, you’re right! I was too quick on the draw. Cube versus octahedron.