But your first assumption is incorrect I think. Yes it is a major issue for schooling kids of not enough teachers accept to go teach. But the reality is that te

But your first assumption is incorrect I think. Yes it is a major issue for schooling kids of not enough teachers accept to go teach. But the reality is that teachers cannot teach. The school shuts because of pressure or coercion. Then there is no teacher. And if the school reopens, good chances teachers are for the most part not willing to get on with it immediately. And the bureaucratic chaos continues. People know better what is right. That includes school adminostrators. Let them do. And let parents do. And let teachers do. We can apply this to most sectors. Why? Because that's how things have been _working_. Even public administrations figure out what works. They get pressured by the actors in their administration and consumer of their services. There are issues of course, but mandating prevention measures top down entirely breaks the natural dynamic that keep things somewhat afloat. Of course there is some coordination taking place, but right now the debate is about what is right for people and what isn't right. Each side claiming they know better, each idea succeeding the previous one after it failed and its consequences known. We don't need to enforce teachers to come to work. They can stay home or find another job and seek other streams of revenue. It always worked that way, we haven't suddenly became slaves or robots to systems where we got to collectively agree where to place them. It has never worked that way, even when it did, aside the misery it generated it always eventually collapsed.