2 ms·
Eh, in my experience all situations are pretty much accounted for to be honest. The exceptions are pretty much all known, except for extreme circumstances like
by Closi 5y ago
Eh, in my experience all situations are pretty much accounted for to be honest. The exceptions are pretty much all known, except for extreme circumstances like fires or injuries (but the system accounts for these too, as new indirect time).
For instance to take your example at this scale the system will always tell you to go do something rather than wait at the pickface for a replenishment (there are lots of options for how this situation can be handled, but the job of the WMS is to capture and handle these exceptions). Less refined warehouse processes might wait, but at the level of system sophistication that these tracking systems need this is likely already engineered out.
IMO in terms of being a fair measure of individual effort/performance - these systems are about as good as you can get in a warehouse and are pretty sophisticated and good at calculating the exceptions. If people disagree with using them as a management tool that’s fair enough, but IMO the calculation is much more thorough and fair than in other places where people get performance managed.
- PoignardAzur 5y agoI was thinking about a recent article about drivers who said they had to cross highways on foot because the app thought it was a road and would penalize them if they drove the long way around. I dunno. Maybe the Amazon's warehouse system is more polished, or maybe the complaints from the drivers were anecdotes not representative of the industry. I haven't really seen recent articles/studies about the working conditions in Amazon facilities, so I don't know how up to date the old complaints are.
- Closi 5y agoThe only thing I would say is that the accuracy of the performance management solution isn’t necessarily indicative of the working conditions You can have a really poor performance management calculation and great working conditions and visa-versa.