3 ms·
Friend, you’re the one using historic emissions to excuse everyone’s inaction. Anyway, this conversation has gone stale. I hope you got whatever nationalistic s
by throwaway894345 5y ago
Friend, you’re the one using historic emissions to excuse everyone’s inaction. Anyway, this conversation has gone stale. I hope you got whatever nationalistic satisfaction you were looking for.
- soperj 5y agoI'm not excusing anyone's inactions. I'm saying the US has to do more. Period. Full Stop.
- throwaway894345 5y ago> I'm saying the US has to do more. I said this twice up thread but you were unsatisfied and continued your anti-American rant. Whatever, I'm glad that we agree now.
- soperj 5y agoSaying it while also justifying their current policy doesn't make what I'm saying an anti-American rant.
- throwaway894345 5y ago> Saying it while also justifying their current policy You're back-pedaling. I was explicitly critical of US climate policy. My two claims have consistently been: "The US isn't doing enough" and "the US is still doing better than China, which continues to increase its emission rate". You brought up cumulative numbers as a rebuttal to those claims.
- soperj 5y agoI'm not.
- throwaway894345 5y agoIf you say so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- lotsofpulp 5y agoThe lack of meaningful taxes on gasoline to prevent wide swaths of the population from buying F150s and other large vehicles to pick up kids from school clearly shows where the US stands.