3 ms·

The author of this app made a post on Reddit a few days ago. https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/pvvi83/googles_amp_pageslinks_are_outrageously_annoying/ h

The author of this app made a post on Reddit a few days ago. https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/pvvi83/googles_amp_pageslinks_are_outrageously_annoying/ https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/pvvi83/googles_amp_p... The program is opensource. https://github.com/christianselig/Amplosion https://github.com/christianselig/Amplosion

Eric_WVGG 5y ago
Haha. Not only did this individual hate AMP enough to make this extension, so did Joseph Duffy https://twitter.com/joe_duffy/status/1409146065912225794?s=21 https://twitter.com/joe_duffy/status/1409146065912225794?s=2..., and so did I https://twitter.com/eric_wvgg/status/1440688602321621000?s=21 https://twitter.com/eric_wvgg/status/1440688602321621000?s=2...
NmAmDa 5y ago
It's source available but not open source. The license part in the repo README explains that.
- pnt12 5y ago
  The author claims its open source but then explicitly omits a license to the repo, so they are misusing the term.
  - kobayashi 5y ago
    They are not. It’s open sourced, not FOSS
3np 5y ago
Questionable if it was ever really open source, more like "source available". The author has nor removed the source from the repo. Most recent public fork I found is now mirrored here: https://github.com/3nprob/Amplosion https://github.com/3nprob/Amplosion > Safari extensions require your permission to run, so in the interest of transparency I wanted to make the app completely open source. [...] > License: This is open source in the interest of transparency, and I hope this doesn't need to be said but please don't take this as an opportunity to reupload the code and call it your own. This is the equivalent to the GitHub "No License", so you're more than welcome to inspect the code and audit it, but you do not have permission to repurpose it as your own.

3 ms·

The author of this app made a post on Reddit a few days ago. https://old.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/pvvi83/googles_amp_pageslinks_are_outrageously_annoying/ h

by KindOne 5y ago

Eric_WVGG 5y ago
Haha. Not only did this individual hate AMP enough to make this extension, so did Joseph Duffy https://twitter.com/joe_duffy/status/1409146065912225794?s=21 https://twitter.com/joe_duffy/status/1409146065912225794?s=2..., and so did I https://twitter.com/eric_wvgg/status/1440688602321621000?s=21 https://twitter.com/eric_wvgg/status/1440688602321621000?s=2...
NmAmDa 5y ago
It's source available but not open source. The license part in the repo README explains that.
- pnt12 5y ago
  The author claims its open source but then explicitly omits a license to the repo, so they are misusing the term.
  - kobayashi 5y ago
    They are not. It’s open sourced, not FOSS
3np 5y ago
Questionable if it was ever really open source, more like "source available". The author has nor removed the source from the repo. Most recent public fork I found is now mirrored here: https://github.com/3nprob/Amplosion https://github.com/3nprob/Amplosion > Safari extensions require your permission to run, so in the interest of transparency I wanted to make the app completely open source. [...] > License: This is open source in the interest of transparency, and I hope this doesn't need to be said but please don't take this as an opportunity to reupload the code and call it your own. This is the equivalent to the GitHub "No License", so you're more than welcome to inspect the code and audit it, but you do not have permission to repurpose it as your own.