5 ms·
Got a source for the "forces you to subscribe" bit? Everything I've seen says that part is optional. Also, even disregarding the extra focal-spot screens, you'
by samplatt 5y ago
Got a source for the "forces you to subscribe" bit? Everything I've seen says that part is optional.
Also, even disregarding the extra focal-spot screens, you're wrong about the resolution. It's the highest of all headsets that don't have insanely wide FOV's like the Pimax8K, by a long way.
2880 x 2720 per eye (Varjo VR-3) > 1832 x 1920 per eye (Quest 2) > 1440 x 1600 per eye (Vive Pro 2) ~= 1600 x 1440 per eye (Valve Index)
- caslon 5y agohttps://store.varjo.com/xr-3 https://store.varjo.com/xr-3 A valid Varjo XR subscription is required to use the device Every XR-3 user must have a Varjo account and a valid XR subscription. Read more here. You could have just checked the store.
- caslon 5y agoJust to eliminate any doubt, the same is also the case for the VR-3 and every other Varjo model: A valid Varjo VR subscription is required to use the device Every VR-3 user must have a Varjo account and a valid VR subscription. Read more here. https://store.varjo.com/vr-3 https://store.varjo.com/vr-3
- samplatt 5y agoFair call. I guess I cast doubt on that because I knew the resolution assertion was wrong. The TOS says that the minimum subscription length is 1 year, so that brings the absolute minimum cost to US$3990 for the VR-3.
- samplatt 5y ago$2000/month is wrong, too. It's $750/year.