2 ms·
The "popular myth" is sourced to both independent security firms and multiple U.S. intelligence agencies, and isn't a partisan issue: https://www.wired.com/2017
by GavinMcG 5y ago
The "popular myth" is sourced to both independent security firms and multiple U.S. intelligence agencies, and isn't a partisan issue: https://www.wired.com/2017/03/marco-rubio-says-hack-attempts-russia-targeted/ https://www.wired.com/2017/03/marco-rubio-says-hack-attempts...
- xqcgrek2 5y agoOh it most definitely is a partisan issue. I'll wait for your evidence for if any votes were changed in machines, the only thing that could truly be construed as "hacking" a election.
- GavinMcG 5y agoBut that's not what anyone was saying. You're making up an easier position to defend. What about the claim that was actually made in the article? > target misleading messages based on material stolen in the Russian hack of Democratic National Committee servers
- 93po 5y agoMy understanding is that the only group that ever got access to Hillary's servers to do forensics was a service that Hillary paid directly and is absolutely not "independent".