3 ms·
> If it had been 2 million dead in the same period, it would still have been a fairly tame global pandemic Untrue, at least for all of US history [1]. I hones
by r00fus 5y ago
> If it had been 2 million dead in the same period, it would still have been a fairly tame global pandemic
Untrue, at least for all of US history [1]. I honestly think this downplaying of the deadliness of COVID belies an agenda. If it was 3x more deadly...
[1] https://www.statnews.com/2021/09/20/covid-19-set-to-overtake-1918-spanish-flu-as-deadliest-disease-in-american-history/ https://www.statnews.com/2021/09/20/covid-19-set-to-overtake...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- lithium_throw 5y agoSo according to that article, Covid so far has been 1/3rd as deadly as the Spanish Flu, yet any comparison drawn to the flu would elicit the response of "ITS NOTHING LIKE THE FLU, IDIOT!" ?? Interesting. I'm not downplaying the deadliness of Covid. The numbers speak for themselves. Spanish Flu had a mortality rate of between 2% and 10%, and mostly killed healthy young adults. Estimates for Covid put its IFR somewhere aruond 0.4%, and it killed almost entirely elderly people.