3 ms·
> Enabling reproducibility is a costly investment, but the cost of doing unreproducible work is even higher. This is a calculation I rarely see organization mak
by beckman466 5y ago
> Enabling reproducibility is a costly investment, but the cost of doing unreproducible work is even higher. This is a calculation I rarely see organization make.
Hopefully things like Alex Freeman’s http://science-octopus.org http://science-octopus.org (or something like it) will take off very soon, which addresses this well (and will make science more accountable).
Meet Octopus, a new vision for scientific publishing: https://www.science.org/careers/2018/11/meet-octopus-new-vision-scientific-publishing https://www.science.org/careers/2018/11/meet-octopus-new-vis...
Dr. Alexandra Freeman | Octopus: a radical new approach to scientific publishing - 29 October 2018: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af6aITLEoD8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af6aITLEoD8
- physicsgraph 5y agoThanks for the links. Sounds like an audacious effort. Pivots away from the current approach are very difficult. Even minor deviations like https://arxiv.org/ https://arxiv.org/ take decades to gain "normal" status in the science community.