It's way worse than that even. The CEO is the one that provided what's obviously a fake email address for the Youtube executive. When you read this paragraph t

It's way worse than that even. The CEO is the one that provided what's obviously a fake email address for the Youtube executive. When you read this paragraph the only plausible scenario is that the CEO was actively involved in this whole idea of faking the conference call: After the meeting, someone on the Goldman Sachs side reached out to Mr. Piper, not through the Gmail address that Mr. Watson had provided before the meeting, but through Mr. Piper’s assistant at YouTube. That’s when things got weird.