4 ms·
So that's a "yes" to my question? > So you would massacre tens or hundreds of millions of civilians because accidentally killing civilians is bad?
by throwaway894345 5y ago
So that's a "yes" to my question?
> So you would massacre tens or hundreds of millions of civilians because accidentally killing civilians is bad?
- Ekaros 5y agoAt this point I think they could reasonably be considered combatants. After all they have done nothing to prevent murder of civilians even if they have had tools like second amendment exactly designed for this purpose. And no it's not massacre, it's justified death penalty for mass-murderers.
- throwaway894345 5y agoThis is the most abhorrent thing I've ever read on this (or perhaps any) forum. I'm done with this thread.
- Ekaros 5y agoStill doesn't even compare to calling mass-murder "accidents"... Or maybe 9/11 were accidents to you too.