3 ms·
Distribution of outcome is probably somewhat skewed by performance management, but I would say the worst performers would be c30% less than the measured standar
by Closi 5y ago
Distribution of outcome is probably somewhat skewed by performance management, but I would say the worst performers would be c30% less than the measured standard and the best performers c30% above.
Good note on the scoping of the tasks - it depends totally on the implementation! Ours was pretty good, but the difficulty was keeping it up to date as you have to change the walk routes and distances any time you move physical equipment on site, or change site rules/physical processes.
- spywaregorilla 5y agoThat's interesting. How consistent are people's placements within that ~60% range? Do you vary comp by much on that spectrum? How often do you aggregate measurements of performance to assess people? I've never gotten to work with an activity level system, just overall daily or larger outcomes.
- Closi 5y agoIt’s been a while since I have been a department manager, but the calculation was live and performance stats would be reviewed daily, although formal performance management would only happen after someone has had consistently low performance below target across a number of weeks. A lot of the conversations were bonus related too - “Hey, FYI you are scraping the bonus threshold so if you really smash it across the next 3 days you can pocket an extra $200 or so”.