3 ms·
How "recent" are the developments of those turbo yeasts though? I wouldn't be surprised we figured out how to create those only in the last century using modern
by vanderZwan 5y ago
How "recent" are the developments of those turbo yeasts though? I wouldn't be surprised we figured out how to create those only in the last century using modern scientific insights.
- soperj 5y agoWhat does that matter when they're replying to "Once you go over 16% or so alcohol, no cell will grow in it. That’s why alcohol above that is distilled"?
- vanderZwan 5y agoBecause it is quite common for common knowledge to be outdated for decades. Even among professionals, let alone the general public.
- moehm 5y agoIt was popular to study fermentation, because nobody knew how it worked. Anton van Leeuwenhoek (the "inventor" of the microscope [0] around 1670) was the first person who saw yeast cells, but nobody knew what it was. In 1880s people realized what yeast is and that it was behind fermentation. Around 1900 breweries began using (their) specific yeast string. Yeast was the first eukaryote which genome was completly sequenced, in 1996. So, yes, research in yeast is relativly modern. If you are interested in this topic, I can recommend the book "Proof: The Science of Booze" [1] which has a chapter on yeast and a following one on fermenation. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonie_van_Leeuwenhoek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonie_van_Leeuwenhoek [1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18222694-proof https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18222694-proof
- vanderZwan 5y agoI am curious actually, thanks for the info!