>Not accepting results in the US is bad for democracy. Accepting faked results in authoritarian countries is even worse for democracy. What if the election was

>Not accepting results in the US is bad for democracy. Accepting faked results in authoritarian countries is even worse for democracy. What if the election was indeed stolen? You must accept the results? Do you just accept the results no matter what? It seems like you have to do that because it's bad for democracy otherwise right? Lets say you accept the results, but what do you do in the face of probably a stolen election? Isn't it over 50% of US states changed/updated their election rules since this last election? I guess actions speak louder than words. I don't know if I have seen so many states agree they needed to fix something so universally and so quickly. Politicians rarely work so quickly.