>> let's say that what you are claiming is true (although your reference leaves much to be desired) - that doesn't mean that there is no "eggs-cholesterol dange

>> let's say that what you are claiming is true (although your reference leaves much to be desired) - that doesn't mean that there is no "eggs-cholesterol danger", just that it was used as a narrative to combat inflation. But the message itself was deceptive. Regardless of the truth value of "eggs-cholesterol danger" the reason for telling people was something else - to combat inflation. There are a number of problems with that kind of manipulation, one of which is that the truth value of the statement will never be ascertainable due to biases all around. BTW eggs contain everything you need (except air and water) to make a chicken. How bad can they be?