3 ms·
I think Matrix is a very hot candidate here - federation (while P2P might be interesting for some, it definitely isn't something for everyone - yet, see below)
by kitkat_new 5y ago
I think Matrix is a very hot candidate here
- federation (while P2P might be interesting for some, it definitely isn't something for everyone - yet, see below)
- scalable from private messaging up to thousands of users ((soon) with Spaces and threading)
- unlimited multi device with synchronization
- prospectively P2P with offline usage (Pinecones)
- open standard enabling competition
- fauigerzigerk 5y agoI agree Matrix is promising and I use it on a regular basis, but I wish they made it easier for non-technical people to join and use. I haven't been very successful convincing people to join. Some tried but were immediately put off by the complicated UI. It takes too much explaining and hand holding. Those constantly in-your-face "session verification" prompts are bewildering and useless. And then it's impossible to disable spell checking in the Element client. I hope it continues to get better.
- tombert 5y agoGranted, this was about 1.5 years ago, so a lot has probably changed, but when a fellow engineer friend and I decided to switch to Matrix, we have a lot of trouble getting the end-to-end encryption working. It required a lot of finagling and sharing of keys and was pretty annoying. Being engineers, we did figure everything out, but I couldn't see any non-technical users going through the headache, particularly when Signal is just "install and you're done".
- fauigerzigerk 5y agoThat one appears to have been fixed. It's just a one-click thing now to enable E2EE.
- tombert 5y agooh? I'll have to check it out then. I would definitely prefer federated chat.
- kitkat_new 5y agoMatrix now and 1.5 years ago is day and night
- NoImmatureAdHom 5y agoDon't forget the bridges! beeperhq is doing this for I believe $10/month (even iMessage). Free, reliable bridges would be the special sauce for Matrix IMHO.