4 ms·
Good points. I wish they’d just stick with safe, limitless Bunker C diesel which hasn’t contributed to environmental damage at all over the previous 42 years. I
by Lammy 5y ago
Good points. I wish they’d just stick with safe, limitless Bunker C diesel which hasn’t contributed to environmental damage at all over the previous 42 years. I didn’t look that up but I know it’s correct because there’s no way the global merchant marine fleet’s 17-thousand cargo vessels would be allowed to burn it in every corner of the world if it could leak out or if obtaining it was environmentally-destructive or if only one nation’s currency was allowed to purchase it: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2003/feb/16/iraq.theeuro https://www.theguardian.com/business/2003/feb/16/iraq.theeur...
Gotta watch out when searching for this stuff though, because Our Enemies’ propaganda distribution networks will use it as an excuse to blame America for having to protect the world from evil people like Saddam and Gaddafi https://www.rt.com/news/libya-all-about-oil-818/ https://www.rt.com/news/libya-all-about-oil-818/
You can tell RT are lying because Vladimir Putin owns only a paltry 50.002% stake in the world’s largest coal gas company and they probably welcome a little camaraderie from rival producer-nations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazprom https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazprom