> The absolutely crazy thing is the person who caused this doesn't think they did anything wrong. And now he's saying this of the person he took the work from

> The absolutely crazy thing is the person who caused this doesn't think they did anything wrong. And now he's saying this of the person he took the work from [1]: 1. "I believe he is a good person, but love colorette too much and prefer impulsive actions ... Impulsive behavior can be very dangerous." 2. "Comments like this [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28662796 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28662796] shows that his behavior in that case was very questionable. Seems like he is systematically put himself in conflicts." True or not, I find his claims of the victim having impulsive or questionable behavior, and systematically creating conflicts, ironic. On a more positive note - it looks like both parties are starting to discuss a resolution [1]; maybe even co-maintainership of the original work in question [2]. I personally think that would take a lot of guts, from both parties, given everything that's transpired. I also think johnnyshields in the linked GitHub thread [1] deserves acknowledgement for some noticeably simple, but effective, attempts at facilitating resolution. [1] https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/pull/14#issuecomment-927346264 https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/pull/14#issuecomment-927346... [2] https://twitter.com/jorgebucaran/status/1442055448899641348 https://twitter.com/jorgebucaran/status/1442055448899641348