3 ms·
1) isn't a bug, it is a lack of a feature. In order to accomplish that you need to double-NAT things because otherwise the internal service will send the reply
by AdamJacobMuller 5y ago
1) isn't a bug, it is a lack of a feature.
In order to accomplish that you need to double-NAT things because otherwise the internal service will send the reply directly to your computer instead of sending it back to the NAT gateway to reverse the NAT. The router needs to NAT the destination IP for the client and NAT the source IP for the server.
The thing is, 99.9999% of these devices never even have the port forwarding feature touched and an even smaller % of the devices where people enable port forwarding care about this.