Chomsky does not disagree with that take on the nature of the universe. He disagrees it must be a feature of our social life. Clearly we have the capacity to

Chomsky does not disagree with that take on the nature of the universe. He disagrees it must be a feature of our social life. Clearly we have the capacity to move beyond blunt conquest of each other literally. Why not socially? To him it’s a matter of how we instigate each other to solve problems. I can prove a lot of math itself with an R Pi. Is the industrial churn to sell new iPhones each year necessary to humanity or the Ferengi Alliance? What would society look like if we forced austerity on capitalists and put all our smart people on equality of condition? My bet is it looks more like 1950s-60s economically. What we do instead is focus on semantics of abstract rules of trade originating from the Bible (40 shekels and 12 goats for a daughter please), repackaged by aristocrats into economics models the normies were too ignorant to understand are just a description of what happens normally in math not English. We don’t need to LARP a physics textbook. Why make music or anything if the goal is to RP we’re just animals? Be an animal.