5 ms·
There may be places where you would want access to starches, agriculture is not feasible, transportation costs are prohibitive, but you also have abundant power
by sk2020 5y ago
There may be places where you would want access to starches, agriculture is not feasible, transportation costs are prohibitive, but you also have abundant power. I’m struggling to think of a place that meets all those criteria.
- gavinray 5y agoOn a spacecraft with solar panels? The desert maybe?
- PeterisP 5y agoIf it's really more efficient than plants, then it would make sense to have solar panels combined with this process also in places where agriculture is feasible and there are no issues with transportation costs.
- yazaddaruvala 5y agoMars?
- xchaotic 5y agothere's not much co2 on Mars
- You-Are-Right 5y agoYou are wrong. Please learn to check facts before posting, thanks. https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/centennial_challenges/co2challenge/phase2-could-help-human-explorers-live-on-mars.html https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/spacetech/centennial_chall...
- bertil 5y agoNear Arctic regions like Lappland where I live fit the bill: * plenty of hydro power (which is why there’s data centers and battery recycling); * agriculture isn’t possible outside with no sun and meters of snow; there’s greenhouses, including opaque ones with purely electric lighting but it’s expensive; * transport by road is common, but harder in winter without fossil fuels and battery uncomfortable at -40ºC/F. Any local activity could generate CO2, but the biggest existing one is paper mills.