I don't doubt you're trying to be respectful, but you're still not considering what your parent might have meant, and are still claiming your own assumptions as

I don't doubt you're trying to be respectful, but you're still not considering what your parent might have meant, and are still claiming your own assumptions as facts for them. For example: > Ongoing access to 70 million tracks ... It'd be pretty difficult to go through 70 million tracks for a person. I know it will be for me. Maybe your parent also doesn't need so many tracks. It is, after all, common for people to compile/curate their own music library. I still do it. I'm not saying your parent does it too, but maybe they have a similar reason to not need access to 70 million tracks. And: > Parent's gripe, as stated, are the ads ... Even if that were the only gripe they've stated, it wouldn't mean that's the only issue they have. In fact, when I read their stated anti-subscription position without an accompanying explanation, I assumed they might have a reason for it, even if they didn't state it here and now.