3 ms·
>> This is yet another instance of the "what is the acceptable risk for introducing a new technology" problem. That's a strawman. Just make the company fully l
by phkahler 5y ago
>> This is yet another instance of the "what is the acceptable risk for introducing a new technology" problem.
That's a strawman. Just make the company fully liable for any injuries or deaths from accidents involving their cars. The market will figure it out from there. But that's not how it's being handled at all.
- esteth 5y agoAt level 5 that makes sense - there is nobody in the vehicle responsible for the safety of the vehicle.
- FireBeyond 5y agoTesla in legal disclaimers: "It's all on you, driver." Tesla in FSD advertising of current state, not future goal: "The driver is only there for legal reasons. The car is driving itself". To be clear, that's a word for word quote from previous Tesla marketing (because I'm sure someone will chime in to say "Tesla doesn't do any advertising!").
- sidibe 5y agoFYI that video is still the main feature on tesla.com/autopilot
- dilyevsky 5y agoNot sure the math works out here. Even if you have 100 deaths/y nationally assuming wide scale rollout (tens of millions of cars, billions of trips) which would be astonishing achievement that’s still $ billions of payouts every year (assuming ~10M payout per death). Yeah… not gonna happen