5 ms·
There is always the argument of Tesla being safer than drunk, intoxicated drivers. First, I would not be too sure about that, but I would rather the governments
by yawaworht1978 5y ago
There is always the argument of Tesla being safer than drunk, intoxicated drivers.
First, I would not be too sure about that, but I would rather the governments implement a DUI check as well as some sort of alertness test before an engine can be started than trust the current fsd software.
Put speed limiters as per the given location and the DUI check in all cars , then let's compare the numbers again.
And how can a Tesla save any driver when any driver is supposed to be in full control of the vehicle at any given time?
If a driver needs Tesla as a saviour, then he has no business being behind the steering wheel.
- josephcsible 5y agoYou're making a claim that in a counterfactual world, FSD might be safer than human drivers. Even if this were true (which obviously there's no evidence of), why is that an argument against FSD in the real world?
- manigandham 5y agoWe don't need more government in our lives. However instead of all that overbearing safety equipment, why not just have automatic driving? > "when any driver is supposed to be in full control of the vehicle at any given time?" Because this is not reality. Nobody is in full awareness and control of the vehicle at all times, that's just how humans work. Even if we were, we still don't have the same reaction speeds. If you actually watch the Tesla examples, you'll lots of aware drivers who just didn't notice or react in time to a collision. Your entire premise is faulty. We can't work with what should be but rather what actually is.