3 ms·
The way that git history was removed makes me wonder if they preferred to claim as their own original work. Unless erasing the history was done by accident. Th
by todd3834 5y ago
The way that git history was removed makes me wonder if they preferred to claim as their own original work. Unless erasing the history was done by accident.
This doesn’t feel like a communication issue as much as an ethical question.
- maleldil 5y ago> Unless erasing the history was done by accident. It couldn't have been. Forking 'properly' on GitHub is a single click. Doing what they did required cloning, erasing .git, then creating a new repo. The original history (now replaced with colorette's) even had an 'initial commit' by ai. This was 100% malicious.