3 ms·

Wonder how “ai” would feel if you just forked postcss without attribution and opened PRs against popular projects to replace. Something tells me they wouldn’t

• iskin 5y ago
  I promote PostCSS alternatives in PostCSS twitter account https://twitter.com/PostCSS/status/777344095748579328 https://twitter.com/PostCSS/status/777344095748579328
  • mzarate06 5y ago
    Which is nowhere near no_wizard's point. And nowhere near what you've done. Gorge Bucaran, author of Colorette, summarizes your actions here https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/pull/14#issuecomment-927134378 https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/pull/14#issuecomment-927134...: "Colorette isn't some obscure project either. It is well used. Now imagine I find a project that meets that description. Clone it. Erase the .git directory. Initialize a new repository. Make a few extraneous changes. Incorrectly benchmark it. Falsely claim improved performance. Tweak the docs. Change the name. Add a logo. Start aggressively promoting it and sending PRs to high-profile projects while leveraging a non-trivial social media following. I'm not against forking a project and adding new value to it. I encourage that. But that's not what's going on here. This is the collector getting away with a new piece for their collection." Comparing that, to "promoting alternatives" to one of your projects on Twitter, shows a creepy lack of acknowledgement. But that's why we're here, isn't it?