This study wasn't even for Kids, FYI. It excludes <18. I'm also wondering where exactly this 32K number came from vs the 800K. There isn't really any discuss

This study wasn't even for Kids, FYI. It excludes <18. I'm also wondering where exactly this 32K number came from vs the 800K. There isn't really any discussion on how this number could be wrong. It seems like you'd need to estimate how many of the vaccinated would reach your study, that would be fraught with error and so this 32K could really be a conservative estimate vs an 800K (govt sanctioned) number. This is a pretty long article so why wouldn't that be included? They go on to discuss Parents worries about Kids and how this study may mislead. WTH? This study doesn't include kids! Another terrible biased article which on the surface dunks on the antivax crowd but only raises questions on motives and whats going on behind the veil.