8 ms·

This was missed in the first place, and was a violation of the license. But this was quickly fixed. I don’t want to defend the „thief“ ai, but I think the orig

by andix 5y ago

This was missed in the first place, and was a violation of the license. But this was quickly fixed. I don’t want to defend the „thief“ ai, but I think the original author is being a bit too dramatic. If you don’t like people „stealing“ your code, chose a more permissive license. But then also less people will use it.

tylermenezes 5y ago
It wasn't fixed until he went public. As a popular maintainer ai knows how to fork while preserving history. Not to mention that he originally claimed the API was merely "inspired" by colorette.
- andix 5y ago
  I know. Maybe it was bad intent, maybe it was just missed. But it was fixed quickly. Now it is fixed. That’s the important part.
  - ghoward 5y ago
    I don't think it could have been "just missed" when the license and his history were stripped from the code.
rasz 5y ago
All fixed indeed https://github.com/babel/babel/pull/13783#issuecomment-927258580 https://github.com/babel/babel/pull/13783#issuecomment-92725...