4 ms·

He literally took his project and branded as his. https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/commits/main?after=566a49b0bec349059762701927759993c2b0fb38+104&branch=main

by Otek 5y ago

He literally took his project and branded as his. https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/commits/main?after=566a49b0bec349059762701927759993c2b0fb38+104&branch=main https://github.com/ai/nanocolors/commits/main?after=566a49b0... Disgusting.

rafaelturk 5y ago
We'll thats legal, and that's all about it when using MIT.
- tzs 5y ago
  I wouldn't be so sure of that. Most of the world's copyright laws follow the Berne Convention, which in addition to the economic rights that US copyright law provides also provides "moral" rights including the right of attribution. The US sort of half-heartedly added moral rights about 30 years ago in order to join Berne, but they are limited mostly to works of visual arts and would not apply to code. They are not so limited in most of the rest of the world. Furthermore in much of the world (such as most of Europe) an author cannot waive or assign their moral rights and so any license term that purports to do so would be invalid in those places. Even if I was the kind of person who would want to misattribute someone else's work as my own, unless I was very very sure that I only had to worry about US copyright law I would tread very carefully.
- fenomas 5y ago
  MIT requires copies to retain the original copyright notice and license info.
iskin 5y ago
the mantion of colorette is on top of Nano Colors docs with clear list of why fork was created and the changes https://github.com/ai/nanocolors#nano-colors https://github.com/ai/nanocolors#nano-colors
- hitekker 5y ago
  As others have pointed out, Andrey Sitnik only added the mention after the twitter thread blew up.
  - robocat 5y ago
    iskin is ai/Andrey Sitnik - he hasn’t made it obvious here, but see other comments in this thread.
  - iskin 5y ago
    Check project’s history. I added Colorette mention in docs and LICENSE just after Colorette’s author asked me (before the Twitter thread). We even agreed on the text. Colorette’s author created this thread because of my PR to Babel.

by Otek 5y ago

rafaelturk 5y ago

We'll thats legal, and that's all about it when using MIT.

tzs 5y ago
I wouldn't be so sure of that. Most of the world's copyright laws follow the Berne Convention, which in addition to the economic rights that US copyright law provides also provides "moral" rights including the right of attribution. The US sort of half-heartedly added moral rights about 30 years ago in order to join Berne, but they are limited mostly to works of visual arts and would not apply to code. They are not so limited in most of the rest of the world. Furthermore in much of the world (such as most of Europe) an author cannot waive or assign their moral rights and so any license term that purports to do so would be invalid in those places. Even if I was the kind of person who would want to misattribute someone else's work as my own, unless I was very very sure that I only had to worry about US copyright law I would tread very carefully.
fenomas 5y ago
MIT requires copies to retain the original copyright notice and license info.

iskin 5y ago

the mantion of colorette is on top of Nano Colors docs with clear list of why fork was created and the changes https://github.com/ai/nanocolors#nano-colors https://github.com/ai/nanocolors#nano-colors

hitekker 5y ago
As others have pointed out, Andrey Sitnik only added the mention after the twitter thread blew up.
- robocat 5y ago
  iskin is ai/Andrey Sitnik - he hasn’t made it obvious here, but see other comments in this thread.
- iskin 5y ago
  Check project’s history. I added Colorette mention in docs and LICENSE just after Colorette’s author asked me (before the Twitter thread). We even agreed on the text. Colorette’s author created this thread because of my PR to Babel.