4 ms·
Interesting idea, and certainly a welcome one as you’ve described given the state of open source web clients, but the lack of screenshots in the readme of this
by PebblesHD 5y ago
Interesting idea, and certainly a welcome one as you’ve described given the state of open source web clients, but the lack of screenshots in the readme of this ultimately graphical software means you’ve not really presented any ‘proof’ that you’ve improved the situation.
Also a few spelling mistakes in the config paths might be worth fixing to make sure people don’t dismiss before giving it a go. For example, the config goes into the path ‘self_configer’ which is possibly a misspelling of configure, but the result is a loss in confidence that the rest of the software is of usable quality.
Nice effort, and congrats for putting it out there!
- derekzhouzhen 5y ago> the lack of screenshots in the readme of this ultimately graphical software means you’ve not really presented any ‘proof’ that you’ve improved the situation. I will put up some screen shots tomorrow. > For example, the config goes into the path ‘self_configer’ which is possibly a misspelling of configure, but the result is a loss in confidence that the rest of the software is of usable quality. Too late to fix that now :(