3 ms·
This looks more like a publicity stunt that anything else. When the AI can generate a cogent argument for its invention being patentable, then I would be prepa
by mannykannot 5y ago
This looks more like a publicity stunt that anything else.
When the AI can generate a cogent argument for its invention being patentable, then I would be prepared to consider its claim. Until then, comparisons to the DMCA seem overblown.
- kevinmchugh 5y agoIsn't that what a patent lawyer is for?
- mannykannot 5y agoA patent lawyer helps you make the case in the correct form, with all the necessary issues addressed. If the AI could work with a patent attorney not already familiar with the technical field of the invention, then I would accept it as the inventor, but if the attorney has to use her own knowledge, or that of third-party experts, to understand what the alleged invention is and whether it is novel, then no. It is all about whether the AI itself understands its supposed invention.