3 ms·
Exactly, it's not (directly) political. These are poor people without jobs and opportunities, and gangsters and criminals. These guys sure aren't protesting any
by andypants 15y ago
Exactly, it's not (directly) political. These are poor people without jobs and opportunities, and gangsters and criminals. These guys sure aren't protesting any issues.
Therefore I'd agree with mortenjorck, the majority of the rioters probably don't have credit cards and probably aren't the kind of people who order stuff from amazon.
- MrScruff 15y agoThere are plenty of poor people in London, the vast majority of whom aren't looting shops. While I'd agree that the looters aren't likely ordering much from Amazon, I see no reason to think they lack homes or are 'on the farthest margins of society'. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14458424 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14458424
- nakkiel 15y agoIf they are poor, without jobs and opportunities, I think they are, one way or another, protesting. We made the exact same mistake in France in 2005. If you prefer, these events are the manifestation of their condition which could be qualified of passive or unconscious protestation.
- andypants 15y agoYep, I agree, that's why I said it's not directly political. There are political issues at hand, even if the rioters themselves aren't aware of them.